Impact of enriched environment on motor performance and learning in mice.

Neuroscience heavily relies on animal welfare in laboratory rodents as it can significantly affect brain development, cognitive function and memory formation. Unfortunately, laboratory animals are often raised in artificial environments devoid of physical and social stimuli, potentially leading to biased outcomes in behavioural assays. To assess this effect, we examined the impact of social and physical cage enrichment on various forms of motor coordination. Our findings indicate that while enriched-housed animals did not exhibit faster learning in eyeblink conditioning, the peak timing of their conditioned responses was slightly, but significantly, improved. Additionally, enriched-housed animals outperformed animals that were housed in standard conditions in the accelerating rotarod and ErasmusLadder test. In contrast, we found no significant effect of enrichment on the balance beam and grip strength test. Overall, our data suggest that an enriched environment can improve motor performance and motor learning under challenging and/or novel circumstances, possibly reflecting an altered state of anxiety.

Prevalence of detectable biotin in The Netherlands in relation to risk on immunoassay interference.

Despite the increasing awareness about biotin interference with immunoassays, so far, only two studies have quantified the prevalence of elevated biotin in patient populations. In a US study, over 7% had biotin concentrations exceeding 10 ng/mL, whereas in an Australian study only 0.8% of ED samples contained biotin exceeding 10 ng/mL. At present, representative data for the European population are lacking. In this study, we investigated biotin prevalence in The Netherlands in a representative cohort of routine laboratory requests in our laboratory using an LC-MS/MS assay for quantification of biotin in human plasma. In our study, we found 0.2% of samples exceeding 10 ng/mL of biotin, a finding more or less in line with the Australian data. Even though the biotin prevalence appears to be low, with concomitant low to moderate biotin concentrations, it is by no means a rare phenomenon. Laboratories like ours are likely to experience biotin positive samples on a daily basis with variable impact on patient care depending on the analytical bias from the immunoassay platform used. Our simple and robust LC-MS/MS assay for quantification of biotin in human samples may contribute to better understanding of the systemic concentrations seen after moderate- and high-dose biotin supplementation and the extent of immunoassay interference.